The announcement on March 31 (US time) that secretary Paulson is going to regulate the United State"s financial markets with changes to it not seen since the Great Depression leaves me with a thought that has been running rat wheels in my mind ever since the current "Credit Crunch" kicked off. Midway through last year, the Fed began sticking its filthy little hands in dikes all across the financial backbone of the USA by propping up institutions who had lent too much money to those who now cannot pay and to keep the wheels of commerce greased by trying to increase liquidity in the credit market-so we can do business with each other.
Now I am skeptical at the best of times as to State involvement in anything, let alone interfering in capital markets and don"t have the foggiest whether the announcement by Paulson is going to change anything in the future at all.
Latest on global financial fallout
German watchdog eyes $600 bln global bank losses: report
US Fed to be grilled over massive support to financial system
East Asia Economies Pressed by Inflation
The 1933 changes didn"t stop the bear market in the 1970s, it didn"t stop the sharemarket crash of 1987 or the tech bubble bursting in 2000 or the current credit crisis because of dodgy lending and investment practices related to that lending.
The interventions by the Fed and its global equivalents, to shore up credit liquidity is the main rat on the wheel in my mind.
What have these interventions stopped?
One can only speculate but one can do that with a largish amount of surety.
During the Great Depression, when faith in financial markets at the time was at an all time low there simply wasn"t any intervention by the State apparatus to ameliorate what happened on that infamous day in 1929 when Wall Street threw a woopsey and capitalism jumped out of tall buildings in the financial districts around New York and around the world.
Have interventions in financial markets by State backed funds globally stopped some sort of 2008 crash from happening?
Probably, but not to the extent of 1929, but it is clear that it would have been a crash of some serious nature had there not been intervention.
Another question I have running through my head is, how long will the squillions of taxpayer dollars pumped into the economy stave off the inevitability of a bigger blowout?
That is harder to answer. In order to know better one would have to know the losses involved in the Sub prime loans and associated sub prime bonds, and we are no closer to knowing that than knowing if Hillary Clinton is going to be the Democratic Party leader or if Barry Obama still loves his preacher.
The vexed question of the massive derivatives market also looms in the minds of investors:
Large amounts of risk, particularly credit risk, have become concentrated in the hands of relatively few derivatives dealers, who in addition trade extensively with one another. The troubles of one could quickly infect the others. On top of that, these dealers are owed huge amounts by nondealer counterparties. Some of these counterparties, as I�ve mentioned, are linked in ways that could cause them to contemporaneously run into a problem because of a single event (such as the implosion of the telecom industry or the precipitous decline in the value of merchant power projects). Linkage, when it suddenly surfaces, can trigger serious systemic problems.
"Derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction. The dangers are now latent--but they could be lethal".
[Warren Buffett 2003]
Warren Buffett aside, I don"t think anyone fancies the Fed"s chances of shoring up the derivatives market should the dominoes start to topple.
Warren Buffett has always
feared the massive derivatives
market.
What is clear is this scenario has at least the rest of the year to fully play out and further State intervention should be carefully applied only if is really going to work and not because the Fed needs to be seen to be doing something.
Hold onto those gold bars and keep the cash under the mattress, you just might need it.
Essential related reading from Share Investor
The Global Economy looks bad now? But wait there"s more
Global credit squeeze: There is no free lunch
Current Credit crunch a blessing in disguise
Lenders must come clean over losses to restore faith in credit markets
Watch for dead cats bouncing
Global Market Meltdown: I can smell the fear from here
Warren Buffett"s The Intelligent Investor
Global Market"s dropping and your portfolio
Global Market Meltdown: What is Warren Buffett doing?
A sensible approach to global market volatility
Visit Share Investor Blog
C Share Investor 2008
No comments:
Post a Comment